Saturday, February 10, 2007

Bush Ignores "Base" at Nation's Peril

Bush and his advisors have compromised the fight against Al-Qaeda in favor of their dangerous ongoing campaign of escalation against Iran.

Unravel Al-Qaeda or Fight Iran?

Helena Cobban

The Nation
February 9, 2007

Copyright © 2007 Helena Cobban - The Nation
[Republished at GRBlog with Agence Global permission]

So just how firmly does the Bush administration want to pursue the campaign to unravel Al-Qaeda? In the 10 February Washington Post, Dafna Linzer has a story, attributed largely to unnamed but concerned administration insiders, in which she gives disturbing new information about the extent to which they have subordinated this campaign to their current push to escalate tensions with Iran. The back-story is that, as Linzer writes,

Since... the winter of 2001, Tehran had turned over hundreds of people to U.S. allies and provided U.S. intelligence with the names, photographs and fingerprints of those it held in custody, according to senior U.S. intelligence and administration officials. In early 2003, it offered to hand over the remaining high-value targets directly to the United States if Washington would turn over a group of exiled Iranian militants hiding in Iraq.

Some of Bush's top advisers pushed for the trade, arguing that taking custody of bin Laden's son and the others would produce new leads on al-Qaeda. They were also willing to trade away the exiles -- members of a group on the State Department's terrorist list -- who had aligned with Saddam Hussein in an effort to overthrow the Iranian government.

Officials have said Bush ultimately rejected the exchange on the advice of Vice President Cheney and then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, who argued that any engagement would legitimize Iran and other state sponsors of terrorism. Bush's National Security Council agreed to accept information from Iran on al-Qaeda but offer nothing in return, officials said.

Now, Linzer has learned that, in addition to Osama Bin Laden's son Saad, those in Iranian custody include al-Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith of Kuwait and Saif al-Adel of Egypt, both of whom are reportedly members of the "al-Qaeda operational management committee."

It is not clear to me how much the Bush administration really cares about the interests of that militant Iranian opposition group, the Mojahideen e-Khalq (MEK), around 3,000 or so of whose members had been in armed training camps in Iraq back in Saddam's day, and have been kept in a detention camp in Iraq under American control. It is important to remember that, as Linzer noted there, the MEK is still on the State Department terrorism list, in connection with some very lethal acts its members carried out inside Iran in the 1980s.

So you'd think the US government might want to actually put on trial at least the leaders of the MEK people they have under their control in Iraq, wouldn't you?

Well, as a matter of fact... No. Instead they have kept them there -- under conditions that may or may not at this point include their complete disarming -- as a way of keeping up the pressure on Tehran.

You can see there, of course, the extent to which the Bush administration has been willing to manipulate the quite legitimate concern people around the world have about terrorism for their own ideological ends.

What also seems clear from the Linzer article is the degree to which the top levels of the Bush administration are ready to compromise the anti-al-Qaeda campaign in the interests of maintaining their current campaign to isolate, encircle, and threaten Iran.

This is completely cock-eyed. Yes, Americans and others have a number of remaining concerns about Iran's behavior -- and Iranians, about America's. But numerous diplomatic channels remain, through which all these concerns can be put on the table, fairly addressed, and resolved. If the Bush administration continues with its campaign to isolate and threaten Iran, it runs the risk of unleashing not only a war between these two nations, but also a tsunami of instability that will "surge" throughout the region and the world...

But even before we have reached that point, the Bush administration's campaign of anti-Iran escalation has already forced many unwelcome costs onto the world community. One of these is that the anti-al-Qaeda campaign -- to which the Iranians have already made many significant contributions -- is being compromised. We should all be very, very concerned.

Helena Cobban has written about (and often from) the Middle East since 1975. She writes a column on global affairs for the Christian Science Monitor, essays for Boston Review, and has published six books on international issues.

Copyright © 2007 Helena Cobban - The Nation

Released: 10 February 2007
Word Count: 672

For rights and permissions, contact:, 1.336.686.9002 or 1.212.731.0757

Advisory Release: 10 February 2007
Word Count: 672
Rights & Permissions Contact: Agence Global, 1.336.686.9002,

Agence Global
1.212.731.0757 (main)
1.336.286.6606 (billing)
1.336.686.9002 (rights & permissions)

Agence Global is the exclusive syndication agency for The Nation, The American Prospect, Le Monde diplomatique, as well as expert commentary by Richard Bulliet, Mark Hertsgaard, Rami G. Khouri, Tom Porteous, Patrick Seale and Immanuel Wallerstein

No comments: