Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Election Could Have Been Thrown, Says Fraud Expert

Election Could Have Been Thrown, Says Fraud Expert
Harris considers token victory for Democrats fixed to quell dissent on mass
voting fraud, liberal bloggers begin to attack anyone who doesn't jump on
the Pelosi bandwagon

Paul Joseph Watson
Propaganda Matrix
Thursday, November 9, 2006

Voting rights activist Bev Harris fears the mid-term elections may have been
thrown in order to quell suspicions about vote fraud in anticipation of a
major 2008 coup. Liberal blog sites are already naively telling
whistleblowers and "conspiracy theorists" to keep quiet now that the left
arm of the establishment, the Democrats, have re-emerged.

"I think it's gonna be interesting to see which election reform groups
decide that it's not such a bad problem after all now that they have
Democrats in there because I think that some of them are actually closet
partisans," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.

"The issue here is not change in the last 24 hours - voting machines can't
be authenticated, they're not necessarily accurate, they're tamper
friendly - nothing has changed about that in 24 hours."

"We shouldn't really try to say well some Democrats are in there so now it's
OK - it's not."

However, that's exactly what a lot of left-leaning establishment types are
parroting, claiming a Democrat victory proves "American democracy still
works," and that questions about electronic voting machines should be tossed

Glenn Greenwald, an attorney and highly regarded liberal blogger, today went
on the attack against those who many in the establishment left had
previously allied with in order to take on the Neo-Cons.

"Chronic defeatists and conspiracy theorists - well-intentioned though they
may be - need to re-evaluate their defeatism and conspiracy theories in
light of this rather compelling evidence which undermines them," states
Greenwald, "Republicans don't possess the power to dictate the outcome of
elections with secret Diebold software. They can't magically produce Osama
bin Laden the day before the election."

Greenwald's naivety is rivaled only by his arrogance and we are already
beginning to have flashbacks to the Bill Clinton era, when liberals
associated their authority with the Democrats and defended their every
action without recourse.

Greenwald seems to have had a memory bypass that prevents him recalling
anything from over two years ago. The fact is that the Republicans did
produce Osama bin Laden before the 2004 election and Republicans have been
caught engaging on vote fraud across the board, including via Diebold
systems. Diebold's own Chief Executive, Walden O'Dell, committed himself to
"helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president," before the 2004

Ludicrously, Greenwald claims that six years of repeated Bush administration
assaults on the Constitution, imperial jaunts that have killed and maimed
hundreds of thousands of innocents, the degradation of how America is viewed
abroad, and the very integrity of the country, has all been reversed by the
empowerment of a party rhetorically led by Nancy Pelosi, a pro-torture,
pro-war, mobbed-up establishment sycophant who has already agreed to protect
Bush and his cronies from criminal investigations.

"All of the hurdles and problems that are unquestionably present and
serious - a dysfunctional and corrupt national media, apathy on the part of
Americans, the potent use of propaganda by the Bush administration, voter
suppression and election fraud tactics, gerrymandering and fundraising
games - can all be overcome. They just were," smarts Greenwald.

Harris encouraged people to take a look at which Democrats got voted in and
what their stance was on the issues that were supposedly the root of voter
discontent in the first place.

"I keep seeing reports on how these are the people who everyone can get
along with, so what does that mean?"

Harris is absolutely right in identifying the fact that yesterday's charade
was nothing more than re-arranging deck chairs, and this is proven again by
the fact that likely speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has already vowed to
protect Bush from criminal impeachment and the two have agreed to work
together on advancing common cause agendas, such as the mass amnesty of
illegal aliens that Bush couldn't get through under a Republican controlled
House, an issue even Rush Limbaugh is now screaming bloody murder about.

Harris called for the temporary bias of favoritism for either the
Republicans or the Democrats to be set aside in favor of the pursuit of
trustworthy voting systems and the integrity of the electoral process in the
long-term. Indicating that she had received more substantive complaints
about vote fraud than in any other election, Harris said the possibility
remained strong that this election had been thrown in order to re-invest
artificial trust in electronic voting machines and stop the momentum of
voting rights activists.

"Supposing I was really wanting to make sure that I could control elections
through voting machines," said Harris, "I would probably throw a fight now
and then because right now we have so much momentum going to get real change
and then if you make it look like 'well there's nothing to look at here,
move along,' then we won't get it fixed by 2008."

Will liberals continue to frolic around totally oblivious to the fact that
the battle has just begun, or will they finally wake up and realize that it
takes more than the re-election of Team B to stop the juggernaut of tyranny
driven by both parties that has steamrollered America since the
assassination of JFK in November 1963?

No comments: