Environmental Stick-Up: Canada's Captured Petroleum Regulatory Boards

The Big Heist: Ottawa Hands Offshore Regulation to Oil Industry

by Sierra Club Canada Foundation

January 24, 2018

K’JIPUKTUK (HALIFAX) - An alliance of twenty Atlantic Canadian and Quebec environmental, Indigenous, and fishery organizations gathered today to express alarm that offshore petroleum boards would be given more power over oceans off Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence under the Liberal government’s plan to modify the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.

The Alliance regards the Nova Scotia and Newfoundland offshore regulatory boards as ‘captured’ unelected bodies, unrepresentative of the public interest, with a mandate to facilitate and promote drilling.

“It’s a clear conflict of interest,” says John Davis, Director of the Clean Ocean Action Committee, a coalition of fish plant operators and fishermen representing over 9,000 jobs in South-Western Nova Scotia.

“To assume that the offshore boards created to promote offshore oil and gas development can somehow fairly assess environmental impacts is the height of folly. It will put renewable resources that have supported my communities for three centuries and our Mi’Kmaq communities for thousands of years at a massive new level of unnecessary risk.”

“The Trudeau government promised to make environmental assessment credible again,” says Gretchen Fitzgerald, National Program Director of Sierra Club Canada Foundation.

“Sadly, if the proposed legislation is passed, they will be doing the opposite. Currently, the federal government’s public consultation calls for an independent national environmental assessment agency (CEAA) with sole responsibility for Environmental Assessments. We support that recommendation”, she says.

“What makes this even more ridiculous is that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans manages the Gulf’s five provincial fisheries from a Gulf-wide point of view,” says Greg Egilsson, Chair of the Gulf Nova Scotia Herring Federation.

“Fish and oil don’t recognize provincial boundaries. It is irresponsible and reckless for the government to consider that regulatory bodies appointed within one province, (i.e. C-NLOPB and C-NSOPB) should have responsibility for environmental assessments which must reflect the potential impact on provinces beyond their own jurisdiction.”

“More and more scientific evidence is coming to light that seismic airgun surveys that precede oil exploration and are to detect oil reservoirs below the sea floor have a pervasive, widespread impact on the entire ecosystem, from plankton, through fish, lobsters, crab and scallops, right up to whales,” says Dr. Linda Weilgart, who is an international expert on the impacts of seismic on marine mammals.

“These Boards have shown themselves to be environmentally irresponsible in permitting seismic surveys in endangered North Atlantic right whale, Northern bottlenose whale and blue whale habitat. It is clear these boards are woefully inadequate and ill-equipped to protect our marine life,” she says.

“Mi’kmaq leaders have been calling for a moratorium on oil drilling in the Gulf of St Lawrence for several years now,” according to Dorene Bernard, Mi’kmaq Elder and Water Protector.

“Why is the federal government not upholding Indigenous rights? Our waters are sacred. We need to ensure we uphold our responsibilities to protect and keep them healthy. Water is more precious than oil.” she says.

“Water is Life.”

-- 30 -- 

For immediate release

Backgrounder: Overview of Offshore Energy Boards and Environmental Assessment

For further information or interviews:

Gretchen Fitzgerald
National Program Director, Sierra Club Canada Foundation
gretchenf@sierraclub.ca

John Davis, Campaign to Protect Offshore Nova Scotia
jbdavis@eco-nova.com

Greg Egilsson
Chair, Gulf Nova Scotia Herring Federation


Troy Jerome
President & CEO, SEN'TI Environmental & Indigenous Services
 troy.jerome@senti.ca


Sierra Club Canada Foundation
PO Box 2007 STN B
Ottawa, ON K1P 5W3
Canada